<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Man with no Blog &#187; WDN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manwithnoblog.com/category/wdn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manwithnoblog.com</link>
	<description>Gary Barber rants on user experience, and the controlled chaos of the Web Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is it the beginning  or the end for the W3C</title>
		<link>http://manwithnoblog.com/2007/02/08/is-it-the-beginning-or-the-end-for-the-w3c/</link>
		<comments>http://manwithnoblog.com/2007/02/08/is-it-the-beginning-or-the-end-for-the-w3c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Barber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manwithnoblog.com/2007/02/08/is-it-the-beginning-or-the-end-for-the-w3c/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Web Directions North today Joe Clark, during his session, presented his Open Letter  to Tim Berners-Lee:  Time to cancel WCAG  2.  Even if Joe is just  stirring the pot and aggravating the W3C, it still presents an interesting  case.  Are the W3C relevant anymore?  Are they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At <a href="http://north.webdirections.org/" title="http://north.webdirections.org/" rel="tag">Web Directions North</a> today <a href="http://joeclark.org/">Joe Clark</a>, during his session, presented his <a href="http://joeclark.org/access/webaccess/WCAG/TBL/">Open Letter  to Tim Berners-Lee:  Time to cancel WCAG  2</a>.  Even if Joe is just  stirring the pot and aggravating the <a href="http://www.w3.org/" title="World Wide Web Consortium" rel="tag">W3C</a>, it still presents an interesting  case.  Are the W3C relevant anymore?  Are they just a group of academics and policy  makers that have lost touch with the reason they where setup in the first  place.  Are they relevant to the average  web designer, standards based or not.</p>
<p>Joe in his  letter does have fair go at summarizing the problems with the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/" title=" Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0" rel="tag">WCAG 2</a>.  Basically it’s confusing, watered down and  really just a waste of time.  I have  looked at the document and frankly I just don’t have the time to workout how to  read and interpret this document.  If it  weren’t for the various <a href="http://alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2/" title="To Hell with WCAG 2">guides</a> to this document I would have no idea what it  was all about. Yes I am watching the <a href="http://wcagsamurai.org/" rel="tag">WCAG Samurai</a> with interest.</p>
<p>With the  designers and developers  taking the lead with standards and new  practicable techniques on the web, one does have to question has the <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym> become  too big, too theoretical, too academic. With groups like <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/" title=" Web Standards Project">WaSP</a>, <a href="http://www.whatwg.org/" title="Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group">WHATWG</a> and  others, taking on  a more practical level approach with the people at the coal face of the web industry.</p>
<p>Will the  <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym> just fracture, will it remain in place and slowly like an old demented  relative be shuffled painfully off out of sight.  Or are we being to hard on the people at the  <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym>.</p>
<p>Yes the <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym>  has some highly talented and focused professionals with just as much passion  for the web as you and me.  It’s just  they seem to be operating in a very verified atmosphere where their members are  not that approachable.</p>
<p>Has the  apprentice surpassed the master?  Is the  W3C relevant any more?</p>
<p><span class="technoratitag">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tags/W3C" rel="tag">W3C</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tags/WCAG2" rel="tag">WCAG2</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tags/WCAGSamurai" rel="tag">WCAGSamurai</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tags/WDN07" rel="tag">WDN07</a>,   <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tags/webstandards" rel="tag">webstandards</a></span> </p>
<img src="http://manwithnoblog.com/5e94d05d/266bbf73/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://manwithnoblog.com/2007/02/08/is-it-the-beginning-or-the-end-for-the-w3c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
